Sean Bryson Fighting Political Correctness

  Sean Bryson's NewRoom NewsRoom
About Civil Liberty / Democracy Watch
Free Speech
In Online Newspaper
Notting Hill London W11 UK
Free Speech On Line

David Hamilton
Conservative Democratic Alliance

Home Schooling In The UK

Democratic Alliance

BCM 9045,
London WC1N 3X X

Save our Children from State Brainwashing

Since the rise to power of the New Left, in the 1960.s - 70.s, education has been to instil the correct attitudes rather than developing the child’s abilities. The authorities brainwash our children and only certain selected topics can be taught in history with the Second World war dominant because Nazism is used to frighten children away from Nationalist sentiments. I mentioned history being reduced to acceptable propaganda: a Government funded study in April 2007 found that Schools are stopping teaching the Holocaust in history lessons to avoid offending Muslim pupils. It found some teachers are reluctant teach this for fear of upsetting Muslim students whose beliefs include Holocaust denial. There is fear of teaching children about the 11th century Crusades when Christians armies fought Muslim armies for control of Jerusalem because a different version is taught in mosques."Children could be taught sex education from the age of four, under plans by Mps. They could also be taught a version of the development of slavery, colonisation and how its links to the British empire and the industrial revolution according to BBC News on 27th August 2008

The Daily Mail of 27th August revealed. They want the Government to make advice on relationships, contraception and sexually transmitted diseases is compulsory in all primary and secondary schools. It is the latest campaign aimed at cutting Britain's teenage pregnancy rate, which remains among the highest in Europe despite repeated attempts by ministers to reduce it.   Editors note ...
You may like to read this article about 'PC' Sex Education in the USA
It's mindblowing stuff !!

Sexually transmitted diseases are becoming increasingly prevalent among youngsters but this is really being imported from Africa by immigrants. But rather than face this a group of MPs led by Chris Bryant, parliamentary aide to Harriet Harman, says that the solution is to educate children more about sex education from a much earlier age.
"Bryant is openly homosexual and BBC News reported on 2nd december 2003 he apologised for e-mailing a picture of himself in his underpants via a gay website. From 1994 to 1996 he was London manager of Common Purpose the controversial charity."
The MPs claim that this is not enough and that children should be given relationship advice 'in context' if they are to make informed decisions about when to have sex. Many Muslims will opt out of this as it will be teaching homosexuality as equal to hetrosexual relations.

Even worse is the The Daily Mail of 22 August 2008, reported that Almost a quarter of all babies in britain are now born to immigrant mothers. In London the figure is 54 per cent, rising to 75 per cent in some boroughs....A report revealed that one in eight pupils speaks English as a second language...MPs and unions have called for urgent action to prevent schools being overwhelmed by the pressure but we can not trust them and must do this ourselves. Migrant children take longer to understand lessons and divert the teacher's energies from other pupils. In 1965 Peter Griffiths MP for Smethwich called for special classes to teach immigrants English and was accused of wanting to start apartheid in schools. It is much worse now so we must do it ourselves. Home education is not an alternative lifestyle choice it is now an imperative. Children were withdrawn for, say, bullying, unhappiness, failure to cater for SEN, or problems with teaching style and the curriculum but it is to save our children from Government manipulation.

Cultural Marxism is a total ideological system, imposing or manipulating opinions for all aspects of life - "Everything is Political." It is a subtle but less brutal version of Stalin's Russia. This process begins with children at school and operates on different levels. There is the physical level.

The State holds DNA records of nearly a million children, some as young as five, and has been secretly taking their fingerprints since 2001. Each week 20 schools introduce fingerprinting. Ostensibly this helps them develop a love of books and reading. It replaces library cards by the child's fingerprint and placing the print on a scanner opens their computer file with records of the books they have borrowed. Minister for Schools and Learning, Jim Knight, revealed that when working on a crime police have access to the children’s fingerprints but parents are not told. To remove the prints takes professional cleansing. The schools, education authorities and the Government say it is difficult to convert this code back though not impossible and a computer whizz-kid could re- create the original fingerprints for identity theft. To save our children we must set up Home Schooling networks and when the authorities try to impose restrictions, refuse them.

In July 2006 The Observer reported that British children, possibly as young as six, will be subjected to compulsory fingerprinting under European Union rules being drawn up in secret. The prints will be stored on a database which could be shared with countries around the world. Under proposed laws being drawn up secretly by the European Commission’s ‘Article Six’ committee, which is composed of representatives of the European Union’s 25 member states, all children will have to attend a finger-printing centre to obtain an EU passport by June 2009 at the latest. The Home Office wants to include children in its biometric passport scheme in two years' and automatically transfer their details and fingerprints to the new national identity database when they are 16. The Government is underhandedly building a genetic database. Data has been used for genetic research without consent, including attempts to predict "ethnic appearance" from DNA profiles.

Sport too has been jettisoned as the new elites detest competition and advocate co-operation to suppress male aggression. Commenting on our Olympic achievements in the Daily Mail of 20 August 2008, Leo McKinstry wrote: "Over the past weekend, our sailors, cyclists, swimmers and rowers won an unprecedented eight gold medals, by far the greatest haul by Britons in two days in a century of Olympic competition...Of the 14 heroes pictured on the front page of yesterday's Mail, six were educated at independent schools… Nor is this some statistical anomaly. The disproportionate Olympic success of privately educated contestants has been an enduring pattern in recent years....Equality of outcome is the central theme of the politically correct British state. The concept of a talented elite is despised rather than celebrated.

Excellence should not be encouraged for fear of lowering the self-esteem of those who lag behind. the sale of playing fields to make way for lucrative housing developments. Then there is the growing feminisation of the teaching profession, where more than 90 per cent of primary school teachers and 60 per cent of secondary teachers are women - a development that again leaves many sporty boys unchallenged...

The Commons Select Committee on Culture recently demanded that our national sporting body, UK Sports, should collect more information on 'the backgrounds' of top athletes. Such data, the committee said, would 'help increase the socio-demographic spread' of funding. In other words, the committee wants more social engineering, more drivel about equality, more intervention in the name of access. This is the sort of nonsense that has ruined state education and it would only undermine our sporting competitive spirit."

The new elites loathe male authority and attack masculinity as patriarchy. They see the main enemy as white racism and this justifies disadvantaging white pupils. No other ethnic group can be racist because they are sentimentally categorised as victims of our oppression and require "special needs". While we are blamed as oppressors we are being oppressed at school by telling children their clothes or views could be offensive. What this really means is what you are doing is not acceptable to the upholders of the totalitarian orthodoxy.

A notorious example was reported by The Times of 7th march 2006: "Traditional nursery rhymes are being rewritten at nursery schools to avoid causing offence to children. Instead of singing "Baa baa, black sheep" as generations of children have learnt to do, toddlers in Oxfordshire are being taught to sing "Baa baa, rainbow sheep". A spokesman for Ofsted, the watchdog which inspects Sure Start centres, confirmed that centres are expected to "have regard to anti-discrimination good practice" and that staff should "actively promote equality of opportunity. Christmas is being cancelled. The Daily Mail of 11th December 2006:"It is the time of year when parents and grandparents look forward to seeing their children dressed up as Mary and Joseph or the Three Wise Men. But the traditional Nativity play at Knowland Grove Community First School in Norwich has been axed in favour of a celebration of a range of different faiths."

But the most alarming was in the Telegraph of 8 July 2008. The National Children's Bureau guidance to play leaders and nursery teachers advising them to look racist incidents among youngsters in their care. This could be a child of three who says "yuk" to unfamiliar foreign food. The guidance is designed to highlight potentially-racist attitudes in youngsters from a young age. It alerts playgroup leaders that even babies can not be ignored in the drive to root out prejudice as they can "recognise different people in their lives". The NCB receives £12 million a year, mainly from Government funded organisations and therefore the tax payer is having money taken to pay for their own children to be moulded by brainwashing into what the Cultural Marxist elites want them to be. The authorities are tightening control of the children.
The school leaving age is to be raised to 18. It is not to improve education but there will be more time for state parenting as in school holiday clubs and breakfast clubs. This is to condition them for being monitored 24 hours a day in the E.U.

Home educating parents receive income support until their youngest child is 16. But in October 2008 new legislation comes into force and when the youngest child is 12, income support will be replaced with job seeker's allowance and the parents have to seek work. In 2010 the age limit for the youngest child will be reduced to 7 years old. The totalitarians want to keep control of the children which is why we must persevere.
This legislation is to force home educating parents to get a job and send their children to school. As it costs the taxpayer about £5,000 per year to keep a child at school there are no economic reasons to force home educating parents into paid employment and children into state schools. It is a political decision. The government should give home schoolers a tax deduction to the same value of sending their child to a state school. A voucher scheme would allow parents to either home school and use the voucher to pay for necessities like books, or, to send their children to state or public school and re-deem the voucher against the cost. Universities are open to Home Schooled children.

Home schooling families could get together to form Home school co-ops. These groups could meet weekly to provide a classroom. They are support families who link to share their abilities and resources and broaden the children's education. This enables children to do science experiments, art projects, spelling bees, discussions; use museums, community centres, athletic clubs, after-school programs, churches, science preserves, parks, and other community resources. There are sports fields and leisure centres to use. By forming groups we could get discounts for block bookings. Secondary school level students may take classes at community colleges, which typically have open admission policies. Parents could work as volunteers.

For advice contact Education Otherwise.


An excellent aticle by Troy Southgate

Riaz Sobrany of Dissident Congress has much experience of Home Schooling.

Two excellent books about PC written from a old liberal perspective are ...
"The Politics of the Forked Tongue" by Aidan Rankin (New European Publications)
and "Retreat from Reason" by Anthony Browne (Civitas).

Free Speech

The text below comes from the Civil Liberty website, it's by Kevin Scott BA Hons, the Founder and Director.
" This will come as a surprise to many of our friends based overseas but Great Britain is now one of the most repressive regimes in the world. We operate under the tyranny of political correctness which is just a floppy term for the repressive implementation of one single, dare we say, rather twisted, view of human society, which doesn't allow for dissent or opposition. The regime creates the framework within which they declare views are either acceptable and tolerated or unacceptable and repressed.
It is a framework which defies common sense and is one which even declares that in a court of law, the truth shall be no defence. "

Civil Liberty