One particularly offensive side effect of the illegal police
recruitment policy outlined above is that it attempts to modify
and circumvent our constitutional laws in pursuit of enforced
integration. I refer here to The Act of Settlement 1701 (still
on statute as it is incapable of repeal and modification)
wherein it states:
"no person born out of the kingdoms of England, Scotland,
or Ireland, or the dominions thereunto belonging (although
he be naturalized or made a denizen), except such as are born
of English parents, shall be capable to be of the Privy Council,
or a member of either House of Parliament, or enjoy any office
or place of trust, either civil or military, or to have any
grant of lands, tenements, or hereditaments from the Crown
to himself, or to any other or others in trust for him."
An example of an hereditament being the grant of citizenship
it therefore follows that the police are now recruiting officers
who are not even (and can never be) British Citizens! The
constitutional status of the Act of Settlement to this day
is established and any purported modification or amendment
of it is ultra vires of Parliament. Such attempts are rendered
illegal and indeed a treason by both the Declaration and the
Bill of Rights as a constitutional statute cannot be altered
by a lesser and subordinate Act of Parliament.
of Constitutional Affairs have recently confirmed to me in
writing that the section of the Act of Settlement quoted above
was appended to (illegally) by the British Nationality Act
1985 so it looks like even they concede that all immigration
premised on an eventual grant of the hereditament (via the
Crown) of British Citizenship has been illegal from 1701 up
to 1985. This also means that all race relations
Acts and legislations drafted, proposed and passed on that
premise are legally voided. Q.E.D.
So having established the constitutional and therefore the
judicial illegality of the whole race and diversity industry
I must now turn to the part played by your publication.
In your Talking
Points column (WfM129) you solicited responses from your
readers concerning the British National Partys recent
election gains across the country.
Responses printed by you
were universally negative, ill informed and all too predictably
ethno-centric. Although I have missed a few copies and so
cannot affirm that the same applies to all your previously
printed correspondences or articles.I would assume however
that your journalists are bound by the NUJ code of practice
which obliges members never to portray any positive image
of the BNP. I request your confirmation or denial in writing that this is the case.
I have read issue 132 and would like you to explain the one-sided debate
solicited by your request for responses. Your respondent John Way of
Birmingham recommends that those who might feel an affinity with
these views are allowed to express why they feel this way
This is an increasingly heard appeal used disingenuously to satisfy
the consciences of those who have no real intention of engaging into
debate but need always to cloak their prejudgement in a veneer of fair-mindedness.
I know because Ive tried to engage, and the resulting
exchange quickly descends to the juvenile reliance on dogma when the
schizophrenic prerequisites of their utopian, egalitarian theorizing
are exposed. It used to be called free speech but if you really mean
what you say and want to understand how we feel and prove that this
is not just another printed platitude, heres how it reads to most
of the indigenous white population. I believe the best way to illustrate
how we in the BNP and most other white people actually feel is to take
you through those letters point by point and strip them of cliche.
John Way; Birmingham
Unfortunately the BNP is a product of our democracy.
What is unfortunate about it? This is as he so rightly observes, our
democracy; our principal export to the world, use it or lose it. It
annoys the hell out of me that the genocidal rump of Stalinist collectivism
is still allowed to manifest itself in the Socialist Alliance parties
but if anyone tried to ban them they would find me standing foursquare
with them in their defence. If that sounds strange to you it shouldnt,
it is democracy warts n all!
Perhaps Mr. Way would recommend theocracy
or pharoic rule by divine right as a method of governance.
are allowed to express why they feel this way so that
the main political parties can have a chance to make them understand
Mr. Way would do better asking the BBC, Ch4, the Guardian or ITV News
etc. why they dont allow members of the 4th biggest political
party to appear on Question Time, Newsnight etc. When he has had a truthful answer from them he can then start looking at their compliance with
the RPA (Representation of the People Act) Then perhaps he can explain
to us why representatives of the MCB are wheeled before the TV watching
public whenever a story, event or atrocity contains a muslim component,
we on the other hand are denied access to the media.
The news broadcasts
are nightly saturated with stories concerning the perceived grievances
of Britains muslims. Why are they granted hugely expensive airtime
in which to justify and reinforce their position when the MCB take no
part in the democratic process? We as a legally constituted party are
rigorously suppressed, censored and imprisoned simply for having the
nerve to stand up for whats left of our own communities.
Politicians run a mile from any debate with British Nationalists, again,
I know because Ive tried. They petulantly withdraw from hustings
debates if a BNP candidate is to share the platform. Such debates, when
finally arranged, are threatened by roving UAF/Searchlight activists
telephoning the venue to threaten the organizers with disruption that
could get a bit nasty. The activists will then contact the
local police to tell them that their threat of a possible
violent disruption constitutes grounds to prevent the meeting, job done.
In one hundred percent of cases it works and the police ban the meeting
rather than protect democracy and the peoples right to free association.
Mr. Way should wake up and smell the political coffee.
Note also the chilling Orwellian use of the language of coercion,
make us understand? If this was an unconscious use of the
term by Mr. Way then I can forgive that as long as he and you accept
that you cannot make us do anything. It is indicative of a preconditioned
and lazy mind that such subliminal use of language passes for debate
or is even considered relevant.
the benefits and beauty of living (in) and maintaining
a harmonious and culturally diverse society.
And what exactly will be the benefits to the white community when they
find themselves out-bred into a physical minority in their own homelands
sometime around 2050/60? (Office of National Statistics & National
Audit Office figures by the way, not mine.)
What benefit or improvement results from the dilution of English law
and constitutional monarchy by the eventual incorporation of Sharia
law? None whatsoever, it may be a suitable basis to run an 11th century
desert fiefdom but has no place in the UK.
What benefit accrues to the African and Asian countries who export
their brightest citizens from their talent pool, their wellspring of
potential reform, to the UK to prop up a mismanaged health and public
What benefit (to us) from having an alien religion supplant the indigenous
What benefit from suffering the practice of barbaric religious animal
slaughter on UK soil?
What is so urgent about permanently changing the face of the UK that
it requires the subjugation of free expression, free association and
the demolition of a thousand years of constitutional governance that
has been imitated (but never bettered) around the world and all against
the wishes of the un-consulted British?
If Mr. Way could supply us with a list of tangible and measurable benefits
rather than the alleged, the nebulous and the totally unquantifiable
we would all be able to make our own minds up. It is often quoted that
immigrants provide a net financial contribution to the economy (£2.5billion)
as the justification for their presence. Quite apart from the fact that
the treasury figures were instantly exposed as bogus, selective and
heavily doctored wishful thinking, it would still not be sufficient
reason for the government to ask indigenous white Britons to shut up
and pay up for their own racial extermination by stealth.
Your publication for so long as it continues, should confine itself
to matters in which it purports to have expertise, it should not be
yet another state sponsored mouthpiece for the massive treason being
carried out against the white population.
Sharmila Dhillon London;
but I dont think its as serious as the media
make it out to be.
Here at least we see acknowledgment of, if not the reasoned methodology
behind the frenzied response of the print and broadcast media to the
if this (further integration) isnt encouraged by
our government theres a strong chance that well see the
BNP enjoy increased support in the future. Please understand our
laws and constitution. It is not the given role of government to aid
illegal immigration and forced integration in any manner. Where has
she been for the past 30/40 yrs? Every facet of life has had the attentions
of the race relations and diversity industry forced upon
it with threats of fine, forfeit, dismissal, imprisonment or public
approbation through the bought media. From nursery children (remember
the Sure Start Scheme suggestions about baa baa green sheep
and Lewis Carrols Piglet!!) to offensive porcelain
pigs on an arrested pensioners window sill, this intrusive enforcement
of political correctness is widely ridiculed and deeply resented along,
quite logically, with those who promote it.
She presumably cannot accept the possibility that it is the accelerating
pace of this forced acceptance of mass immigration by Nu-Labour in particular
that is waking the indigenous white population to their coming fate.
The very last thing they want is more of the same. The nu-labour regime
in particular is in full thrall to the directives of the MCB, CRE, EU
et al and has brought this upon itself.
by those who feel disenfranchised from mainstream society
and blame immigration for their problems.
More sixth form sociology clichés. Native British people see
their problems in much wider terms than your correspondents simplistic
analysis. Yes immigration is a massive and legitimate concern. Anyone
who would deny that legitimacy as a manifestation of institutional
racism has no business making pronouncements upon it as such denial
removes any chance of debate at a stroke. Our concerns are many and
interlinked, for example...
Lets deal with some fundamentals. Our islands are our only home
lands, we have no other.
We assert our primacy in the islands of the UK and the right to own
this land and to exercise the birthright of the protection of our laws
and conventions in perpetuity.
Carta is still in force and was never a document granting rights
to the people of Britain, it was a recognition (effectively at the point
of the peoples sword) by the Monarch of rights we have always
had. Through it the executive power of Monarchy and Parliament are forever
held as subject to the consent of the people in perpetuity. Parliament
cannot dissolve itself nor can it abrogate its powers.
This is fundamental stuff in case the penny hasnt dropped!
And most crucial of all;
The people are sovereign in their parliament, not
ministers, not the Lords, not the monarch and most definitely not the
European Council of Ministers or the Muslim Council of Britain.
Being subject to the same physical constraints as the rest of the universe
means that there is a natural physical limit to the population that
any defined area can support. This seems obvious but why have the Green
Party silently dropped any policy reference to an actual figure? Answer;
the current UK population is untenable and only sustained and made governable
by the promise of continuing input of oil derived energy.
That promise was never anyones to give and is about to be broken
as oil production hits peak (North Sea output peaked in 1999) and from
this point on we begin riding the down-slope of the energy graph. No
effective substitute looks likely to appear in time to replace oil derivatives
for road transport fuel, huge agrichemical use, power generation, off
grid home heating, rail, air travel. All is dependent on oil and on
any planetary system there is only ever one chance for an energy based
society to evolve, its effectively a 1-Shot deal. This, friends,
is it. You are living at the very peak of human civilisation. Forget
the post apocalyptic rise of the cockroach, it was only ever science
fiction. Oil should have been used sparingly to ensure our successful
transition to ultimate sustainability of the human race into and through
the coming millennia. It turned out to be the road not taken and we
have instead prepared for ourselves an unappetizing banquet of cold,
What is the likely scenario as that fact begins to dawn on the British
and international public together with the instant removal of vast amounts
of speculative capital from the stilt walking financial
markets as everyone finally twigs that there is nothing viable left
to invest in and moreover nothing to invest with? What realisable assets
do you suppose will pay those billions of worthless, built on
a promise pensions worldwide? How will ambulances run? Who will
fuel and fund the police or the construction industry or manufacturing?
Commuting will not be viable, holidays and foreign homes will be abandoned
as ridiculously wasteful concepts. (for the likes of us) Tap water will
find its true value before it eventually ceases to flow and we commence
our transition to the harsh reality of a low/no energy subsistence society.
Against this background what do you suppose will be the reaction of
the English (or indeed any other race) when they are asked to move aside
and let another unassimilable racial group take over the land and enter
the competition for rapidly disappearing resources? They will ask the
inevitable question, why should we? and no-one could decry
them for it. It is survival instinct pure and simple, a consequence
of natural law and natures laws are not broken with impunity.
Let us also remember that MI5 reported to cabinet recently that Britain
as it stands is only four square meals from wide scale civil disturbance.
Katherine Kemp East Ham
The BNP are a despicable bunch
No explanations or reasoning given but shes entitled to her opinion
however bigoted; She then goes on to repeat the tired old soar;
our government doesnt do enough to create harmony
How many state and lottery funded inter-faith research projects,
Gambian Womens Enterprise Groups and Cohesion Funds will it take?
Weve had forty years of this and no visible advantage has yet
accrued to the native British therefrom. Why on earth should we be expected
to join in the clamour for more?
its the BNP
that fuels the fire through
fear and lies.
The respondent is merely demonstrating the journalistic tyranny of
language. For the loaded phrase fear and lies substitute
the phrase raising valid concerns and the sting is instantly
drawn from the sentence. You in your capacity as editor should be above
such unsophisticated linguistic tricks employed solely to raise emotional
response to a sentence that lacks valid content. You at least should
be able to spot and exclude them.
I would be grateful if Mrs Kemp would provide specific examples of
BNP lies. I will be more than happy to investigate and respond
to them. Incidentally, on the subject of lies lets not exclude
good old fashioned corruption. It might be appropriate at this point
to mention that we have and want no ties to big business
donors, greasers or bagmen looking for peerages. Our party accounts
were recently pronounced by a senior Electoral Commission official as
the only ones that give us no cause for concern. That didnt
stop Barclays and HSBC bowing to pressure from the Daily Telegraph (prop.
Richard Desmond, pornographer and Labour donor) and withdrawing banking
facilities from the party. They dont seem to have a problem stashing
money from the bank robbers of the IRA though do they!
I would venture to suggest that recent comments from Shahid (= the
martyr) Malik MP about the BNP marching around Bradford
and Oldham being the cause of the recent rioting and racial tensions
are a textbook example of alarmist lying. For information, the BNP havent
marched anywhere since 1998 and have no intention of so doing. Get your
facts right Mr. Malik, the chances of an apology, retraction and correction?
then retreat to the sidelines and watch community divides
We do not retreat anywhere because there is nowhere to retreat to,
although I note that the scion of the left Billy Bragg retreats to his
agreeable six bedroomed manse in hideously white Dorset
rather than Brent East. In Coventry we stood in the most heavily diversified
ward just to make that very point; that we consider no part of this
country a no-go area and will stand where and when we choose.
The Keighley police have in desperation called on the local BNP representatives
for help in resolving the multi-racial chaos when endless consultations
and fora with unelected ethnic community leaders have been
utterly unable to meet the challenge.
The govt doesnt help this by announcing that immigration
is out of control and the Home office is in disarray.
She just doesnt get this democracy thing does she?
To the British
it is of much greater concern that their government tried (yet again)
to hide their dysfunction by withholding such information! We give the
government of the day the authority, duty and finance to control and
defend our countrys borders amongst other things. We have an absolute
right to know if, why and how it is dysfunctional. Whats the problem
with this? Its part of the accountability process shes asking
for but yet she bemoans the results of that process? Im sorry
but Im getting really confused with her train of logic here!
That immigration is out of control cannot be a matter for dispute when
the past three Home Secretaries admit they havent a clue
how many immigrants have entered, left or still remain in the country!
needs to be some accountability from our government.
Katherine, there is a means of accountability, it is called a ballot
box although the sanctity and security of these is now the subject of
several court cases following the disgraceful activities in Birmingham
of six muslim councillors last year. The contempt for democracy and
the franchise displayed by this and countless similar acts around the
country cuts many English voters to the core. It offends the memory
of the price they paid to obtain and keep the sanctity of the ballot
box and what it represents. Such disrespect will not easily be forgotten.
We have an example before the courts currently in relation to the ward
in Coventry mentioned above and shabby state backed attempts to get
the Sandwell and other declared results overturned. Banana republic?
Well yes, it appears so!
However one can only cast an informed vote on the basis of correct
information and the true facts of government performance have forever
been deeply hidden. Therefore if you want the facts one must be prepared
to find out for oneself.
The problem is that it takes much time, effort
and expense wading through countless government and EU web pages. How
many have actually read the Draft EU Constitution? 250 plus pages without
a single laugh in it! Not many Ill bet, yet this treacherous document
is almost wholly dedicated (save for a cursory preamble about human
rights) to promoting the advance of global trade interests and
sacrificing what vestige of national independence, identity and self
determination we yet hold.
All corrupted government will try to appropriate ever more power to
itself. Additionally, it must forever be borne in mind that The
price of freedom is eternal vigilance. Therefore it is every citizens
duty to make himself aware of the truth and actively rake for it wherever
it has been secreted. Ignorance of the cause of ones demise was never
a defence in nature neither is it one in law, politics or demographics.
Our constitution was wrought from a thousand years of experience and
bloodshed so that the citizen and subject of the Monarch is protected
by Magna Carta and the Bill of Rights in any rightful or necessary challenge
to either government or Monarch.
Those without the stamina or critical ability to sort fact from fiction
in a governments arguments and actions invariably take the lazy
way out and believe the corrupted output of the media for their dose
of the currently fashionable group-think. It also conveniently provides
the path of least resistance, is a cheap distraction from reality, satisfies
the desire for a mental wallpaper of conformity to cover the cracks
in an increasingly disparate world and wastes a lot of money in pursuit
of not much at all.
The last thing they will find in the media however
is the truth. Summary;
Well, you requested dialogue as did your correspondents, so here it
is. I hope that this may provide some insight into the real and perceived
problems the indigenous white population is facing. They are entirely
legitimate and yet BNP supporters and the growing membership are being
arrested and jailed for having the nerve to raise the warning, sacked
for mere membership of the party, homes are raided and hard drives stolen
for Special Branch use in building up a picture of inter party networks.
The major parties actively and strategically collaborate with the media
and each other in their vain attempts to suppress the BNP. Principle
counts for nothing, statesmanship has been banished and replaced by
an inadequate collection of change managers, focus groups,
bagmen, backslappers and career sycophants, toothless select committees,
a grossly politicised pseudo-paramilitary police force, a rogue judiciary
that is outwith the law, an executive (cabinet) run by a cabal of ex
and current Marxists, suspected paedophiles, business and Bilderberg
Group placemen (who they?) plus a functional illiterate, the list is
practically endless unlike the patience of the British.
They have no
shame at all in holding the continuation of each others gravy
trains as more important than the interests of the very people who put
them there and whose sufferance and unwillingness to be provoked has
been the real factor in keeping UK society stable.
I can make no apology for the length of this letter and there are a
hundred and one everyday examples of anti-white discrimination I could
have included but space and a vengeful rouge judiciary precludes their
inclusion, it is also too easy to fall into editorialised speechifying!
I formally request your response to the above. For my part, I have
no objection to this being forwarded to your correspondents for their
response should they choose to avail themselves of the opportunity to
justify their position with facts and reasoning. I have no naïve
expectation that any part of this reply will be submitted for publication,
yours and their request for, and tolerance of debate therefore is about
to be tested.
In anticipation of your acknowledgement and soonest reply,
Yours with concern,
Mr. Davied E. Clarke & family
After presenting this thing to the job centre manager and pulling it
apart (politically) I read them the riot act and vowed to take it as
far as necessary.
Suddenly (from about October 06) this bi-weekly, expensively printed
piece of blatant racial preference failed to appear. Enquiries to their
offices elicited the response that it was "no longer viable to
produce" whatever the hell that means. It's expensively produced
because it derives its income from the marketing budgets of the armed
forces, police forces, local government recruitment ads, British Gas,
BT etc, the usual quota obsessed entities.
The point is, it's no longer distributed in Coventry, it would be interesting
to know if anyone else is taking this up and if they've had any success.
Thanks for picking this one up and publicising it on your site. Top
stuff! »> '
Works for Me' ( Earl's Court, London, 21st October 2006 )
For our children's futures Dave C.